Effectiveness of the Democratic Relation Instruction to Mothers on Psychological Capital of Daughters

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Educational Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background & aim: Psychological capital is one of the new concepts discussed nowadays. In fact, the design of this approach reflects its significance in the field of social capital. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of teaching democratic relationships to parents on female high school students’ psychological capital.Materials and methods: The present study was conducted through the quasi-experimental method using pre and posttest and control group. The statistical population of this study includes all mothers and female high school students residing in district 4 of Tehran city in 2015-16, from which, 42 subjects were selected using the cluster random method, and finally they were randomly placed in two groups with 21 members (control and experiment). Research data was collected using Luthans psychological capital questionnaire. The experimental group attended ten 90-minute sessions of democratic relationships training, while the control group attended none. The collected data was analyzed using ANCOVA in descriptive statistics.Findings: Findings indicate that there is a significant difference in the psychological capital of the control and experimental group, showing that teaching democratic relationships to mothers was effective in increasing their daughters’ psychological capital.Conclusion: Based on the mentioned findings, it can be concluded that psychological capital is a personality trait with growing and developing capabilities, and it is affected by several factors including teaching democratic relationships to parents.

Keywords

References

  1. Luthans F, Youssef CM, Avolio BJ. Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
  2. Sobhi Gharamaleji N. Idividual Defferences. Tehran: University of Applied Science and Technology; 2007.
  3. Dinkmeyer DC, McKay GD. Systematic training for effective parenting: Leader's manual. Tehran: Danjeh Publication; 2008.
  4. Dreikurs R, Soltz V. Happy Children: A Challenge to Parents. Tehran: Arasbaran Publication; 2012.
  5. Alizadeh H, Sajjadi H. Dreikurs: Democratic and mutual respect. Tehran: Danjeh Publication; 2010.
  6. Sabri M, Fouladchang M, Mohammadi Dahaghani M, Golzar HR. The relationship between family communication patterns dimensions and resilience in high school students: ediating role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Psychological Models and Methods. 2014;5(18):109-28.
  7. Tozandejani H, Tavakolizadeh J, Lagzian Z. The Effect of Pareniting Styles on Self-efficacy and Mental Health of students. Ofogh-e-Danesh; Journal of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. 2011;17(3):56-65.
  8. Sunarty K, Dirawan Darma G. Development Parenting Model to Increase the Independence of Children. International Education Studies. 2015;8(10):1-213.
  9. Armstrong B, Mackey ER, Streisand R. Parenting behavior, child functioning, and health behaviors in preadolescents with type 1 diabetes. Journal of pediatric psychology. 2011;36(9):1052-61.
  10. Ghane Sangatash A, Mirzazadeh ZS, Azimzadeh SM, Abdolmaleki H. The role of psychological capital on social capital of Physical Education Students of Mashhad Universities. Scientific Journal Management System. 2016;4(15):91-106.
  11. Naderaian A, Haji Poor E. Investigating the relationship between psychological capital and trust building. The first International Conference on Innovation and Research in Arts and Humanities; Torkey, Istanbul2015.
  12. Gardner DM. Parent’s in fluency on child social self- efficacy and social cognition. Wisconsin: Marquette University; 2011.
  13. Aunola K, Nurmi JE. The role of parenting styles in children's problem behavior. Child development. 2005;76(6):1144-59.
  14. Bagheri F. Hardening, self-efficacy beliefs in self-esteem strategies in female students. Thought and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2009;4(14):35-46.
  15. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan; 1997.
  16. Shaji H. Theoretical Foundations and History of Resonance Structural Psychology and Its Components. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch; 2011.
  17. Snyder CR, Irving L, Anderson J. Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective. In: Synder CR, Forsyth DR, editors. Snyder, C R, and Donelson R Forsyth Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective. New York: Pergmon; 1991. p. 285-305.
  18. Snyder C. Managing for high hope. R & D Innovator. 1995;4(6):6-7.
  19. Snyder CR, Lopez SJ. Oxford handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, USA; 2009.
  20. Culbertson SS, Fullagar CJ, Mills MJ. Feeling good and doing great: the relationship between psychological capital and well-being. Journal of occupational health psychology. 2010;15(4):421-33.
  21. Bandura A, Locke EA. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of applied psychology. 2003;88(1):87-99.
  22. Bandura A. Social foundation of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs; 1986.
International Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
Winter 2018
Pages 142-146

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics