Home Articles List Article Information
International Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 12 (2018-2019)
Volume Volume 11 (2017-2018)
Volume Volume 10 (2016-2017)
Volume Volume 9 (2015-2016)
Volume Volume 8 (2014-2015)
Volume Volume 7 (2013-2014)
Volume Volume 6 (2012-2013)
Volume Volume 5 (2011-2012)
Volume Volume 4 (2010-2011)
Volume Volume 3 (2009-2010)
Volume Volume 2 (2008-2009)
Volume Volume 1 (2007-2008)
Salavati, S., Mootabi, F., Sadeghi, M. (2018). Reaction to the Infidelity in Iranian couples: A Phenomenological Study. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 11(4), 135-141.
Sara Salavati; Fereshteh Mootabi; Mansooreh Sadat Sadeghi. "Reaction to the Infidelity in Iranian couples: A Phenomenological Study". International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 11, 4, 2018, 135-141.
Salavati, S., Mootabi, F., Sadeghi, M. (2018). 'Reaction to the Infidelity in Iranian couples: A Phenomenological Study', International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 11(4), pp. 135-141.
Salavati, S., Mootabi, F., Sadeghi, M. Reaction to the Infidelity in Iranian couples: A Phenomenological Study. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2018; 11(4): 135-141.

Reaction to the Infidelity in Iranian couples: A Phenomenological Study

Article 2, Volume 11, Issue 4, Winter 2018, Page 135-141  XML PDF (432.09 K)
Authors
Sara Salavati email 1; Fereshteh Mootabi2; Mansooreh Sadat Sadeghi2
1M. Sc. in Family Therapy, Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University
Abstract
Introduction: Infidelity can have devastating effects on the couple and other important people in couple's life. So many researches are dedicated to examine the predictors of infidelity, however reaction to the infidelity is still an unknown issue; although it has important roles in couple's interaction following discovery, psychological and physiological wellbeing of the person, husband and children. Hence, this study was conducted with the purpose of examining people's reaction to the infidelity in Iranian couples.Methods: Present study was a qualitative research with the approach of phenomenology. People with the experience of spouse's infidelity were invited to participate in a psychological research through public notice. Purposive sampling continued till the saturation of data was achieved. Through this procedure 16 people were interviewed. The in-depth semi structured interview was used to explore participant's reactions to the infidelity.Results: In this research, the Colaizzi's method was used to analyze the data. After transcribing the interviews, formulated meanings were extracted. Within analyzing process, these formulated meanings were classified in 12 theme clusters. Finally 5 major themes emerged: Reactions to oneself, reactions to spouse, reactions to spouse's family of origin, reactions to third person, and reactions to others (own family, children and friends).Conclusions: Findings were consistent with theories which conceptualize reaction to the infidelity as the traumatic response. But the clusters of reactions to spouse family of origin and physiological reactions are the specific outcomes of this research.
Keywords
Couple; Infidelity; Iranian Sample; Phenomenology; Qualitative Research
References
  1. Blow AJ, Hartnett K. Infidelity in committed relationships I: A methodological review. Journal of marital and family therapy. 2005 Apr 1;31(2):183-216.
  2. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press; 1994 Oct 17.
  3. Glass S P, Wright TL. Reconstructing marriages after the trauma of infidelity. In W. K. Halford & H J Markman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of marriage and couples interventions (pp. 471–507). Wiley; 1997.
  4. Brown EM. Patterns of infidelity and their treatment. Psychology Press; 2001.
  5. Buunk BP. Sex, self-esteem, dependency and extradyadic sexual experience as related to jealousy responses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1995 Feb;12(1):147-53.
  6. Ciarocco NJ, Echevarria J, Lewandowski Jr GW. Hungry for love: The influence of self-regulation on infidelity. The Journal of social psychology. 2012 Jan 1;152(1):61-74.
  7. Glass SP, Wright TL. Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of sex Research. 1992 Aug 1;29(3):361-87.
  8. Gordon KC, Baucom DH, Snyder DK. An integrative intervention for promoting recovery from extramarital affairs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 2004 Apr 1;30(2):213-31.
  9. Beach SR, Jouriles EN, O'leary KD. Extramarital sex: Impact on depression and commitment in couples seeking marital therapy. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 1985 Jun 1;11(2):99-108.
  10. Cano A, O'leary KD. Infidelity and separations precipitate major depressive episodes and symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 2000 Oct;68(5):774.
  11. Shackelford TK, Buss DM, Weekes-Shackelford VA. Wife killings committed in the context of a lovers triangle. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2003 Jun 1;25(2):137-43.
  12. Janus SS, Janus CL. The Janus report on sexual behavior. John Wiley & Sons; 1993.
  13. Betzig L. Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology. 1989 Dec 1;30(5):654-76.
  14. De Stefano J, Oala M. Extramarital affairs: Basic considerations and essential tasks in clinical work. The Family Journal. 2008 Jan;16(1):13-9.
  15. Walker T R, Ehrenberg MF. Perceived reasons for parental divorce: Inï‌‚uence on young adults’ attachment styles. Journal of Adolescent Research. 1998; 13, 320–342.
  16. Geiss SK, O'Leary KD. Therapist ratings of frequency and severity of marital problems: Implications for research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1981 Oct 1;7(4):515-20.
  17. Whisman MA, Dixon AE, Johnson B. Therapists' perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology. 1997 Sep;11(3):361.
  18. Baucom DH, Snyder DK, Gordon KC. Helping couples get past the affair: A clinician's guide. Guilford Press; 2011.
  19. Brown EM. Patterns of infidelity and their treatment. Routledge; 2013 May 13.
  20. Peluso PR, editor. Infidelity: A practitioner’s guide to working with couples in crisis. Routledge; 2007 Jun 15.
  21. Shahali S, Mohammadi E, Lamyian M, Kashanian M, Eslami M. Experience of healthcare providers to deal with victims of sexual assault: A qualitative research. 2014.
  22. Colaizzi P. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In RS Valle, M King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 4871). Oxford University Press; 1978.
  23. Shackelford TK, LeBlanc GJ, Drass E. Emotional reactions to infidelity. Cognition & Emotion. 2000 Sep 1;14(5):643-59.
  24. Mazaheri MA, Sadeghi MS, Roshan M, Ashtarian K, Ahmadi AE, Hamidi …, Panaghi L. Politics, strategies and solutions to reduce and control divorce in Iran. Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. 2008
  25. Mazaheri MA, Sadeghi MS, NasrAbadi OL, Ansarinejad F, Abbasi M. Relationship between mate selection styles and the quality and sustainability of marriage. Strategy for Culture. 2009; 5, 55-72.
  26. Sadeghi MS, Mazaheri MA, Mootabi F. Iranian couples interaction coding system. Journal of Family Research. 2010; 6(3), 353-372.
  27. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, editors. Kaplan and Sadock's pocket handbook of clinical psychiatry. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
  28. Sapolsky RM. Why zebras don't get ulcers: The acclaimed guide to stress, stress-related diseases, and coping-now revised and updated. Holt paperbacks; 2004 Sep 15.
  29. Brunner LS. Brunner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing (Vol. 1). S. C. C. Smeltzer, B. G. Bare, J. L. Hinkle, & K. H. Cheever (Eds.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
Statistics
Article View: 53
PDF Download: 116