A Study on Factor Structure and Validation of Social Reward Questionnaire in Iranian Youth

Authors

1 Department of Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Psychology, School of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction: The present study was carried out with the aim of investigating the reliability, validity, and standardization of social reward questionnaire (SRQ) in Iranian youth. Method: This is a descriptive (correlative) study for which 419 youth of 18 to 36 years responded to SRQ. The data was studied using exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach’s Alpha and Pearson correlation coefficient.  Result: The analysis of exploratory data showed that 18 items of SQR have been loaded on four factors of "acceptance", "prosocial interactions", "sexual/abusive relations" and "negative social potency." The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients obtained for the four items stood at 0.75, 0.67, 0.61 and 0.38, respectively.Conclusion: The results of the present study confirm the stability of factor structure and validity of social reward questionnaire for measuring this concept in Iranian youth.

Keywords


  1. Schotsman P, Economic M. Monetary vs. social rewards. The effects of status on reward preference. 2015.
  2. Foulkes L, McCrory EJ, Neumann CS, Viding E. Inverted social reward: Associations between psychopathic traits and self-report and experimental measures of social reward. PloS one.
  3. ;9(8):e106000.
  4. Smith DV, Clithero JA, Boltuck SE, Huettel SA. Functional connectivity with ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects subjective value for social rewards. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2014;9(12):2017-25.
  5. Krach S, Paulus FM, Bodden M, Kircher T. The rewarding nature of social interactions. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. 2010;4:22.
  6. Foulkes L, Viding E, McCrory E, Neumann CS. Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation. Frontiers in psychology. 2014;5.
  7. Baird SA. The links between primary and secondary psychopathy and social adaptation. Colgate University Journal of the Sciences. 2002;34:61-82.
  8. White BA. Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014;56:116-21.
  9. Foulkes L, Bird G, Gökçen E, McCrory E, Viding E. Common and distinct impacts of autistic traits and alexithymia on social reward. PloS one. 2015;10(4):e0121018.
  10. Barman A, Richter S, Soch J, Deibele A, Richter A, Assmann A, et al. Gender-specific modulation of neural mechanisms underlying social reward processing by Autism Quotient. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2015;10(11):1537-47.
  11. Cardi V, Matteo RD, Corfield F, Treasure J. Social reward and rejection sensitivity in eating disorders: An investigation of attentional bias and early experiences. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 2013;14(8):622-33.
  12. Nawijn L, van Zuiden M, Frijling JL, Koch SB, Veltman DJ, Olff M. Reward functioning in PTSD: A systematic review exploring the mechanisms underlying anhedonia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2015;51:189-204.
  13. Gromann PM, Heslenfeld DJ, Fett A-K, Joyce DW, Shergill SS, Krabbendam L. Trust versus paranoia: abnormal response to social reward in psychotic illness. Brain. 2013:awt076.
  14. Montalto T, Baguet T, Vlaeyen Y, Michaux E, Claes L, Uzieblo K, editors. The social bully? Sensitivity for social reward in psychopathy. The treatment of psychopathy: Making the impossible possible?; 2014: Thomas More.
  15. Kashdan TB, Yarbro J, McKnight PE, Nezlek JB. Laughter with someone else leads to future social rewards: Temporal change using experience sampling methodology. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014;58:15-9.
  16. Buss AH. Social rewards and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44(3):553.
  17. Elliot AJ. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational psychologist. 1999;34(3):169-89.
  18. Bryant FB, Yarnold PR. Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. 1995.
  19. Ogoshi Y, Ogoshi S, Takezawa T, Mitsuhashi Y. Impact of the Facial Attractiveness of a Social Reward on Event-Related Potential Activities and Task Performance. Sensors and Materials. 2016;28(4):321-7.
  20. Tobler PN, Preller KH, Campbell-Meiklejohn DK, Kirschner M, Kraehenmann R, Stämpfli P, et al. Shared neural basis of social and non-social reward deficits in chronic cocaine users. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2016;11(6):1017-25.
  21. Spielmann SS, Maxwell JA, MacDonald G, Baratta PL. Don’t get your hopes up avoidantly attached individuals perceive lower social reward when there is potential for intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2013;39(2):219-36.
  22. Reid A. Gender and sources of subjective well-being. Sex Roles. 2004;51(11-12):617-29.