Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of Experiences in Close Relationships Scale –Revised for Using in Children and Adolescents (ECR-RC)

Authors

1 PhD Student of Counseling, Department of Educational Sciences & Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences (AS), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The investigation of attachment processes during middle childhood and early adolescence has been hampered by a relative lack of measures for this age group.The aim of this study was investigating the psychometric properties of Experiences in Close Relationships Revise-Scale for use with children and adolescents (ECR-RC). It is a self-report questionnaire for measuring attachment anxiety and avoidance.  Method: Sample size of 430 students was selected by stratified multistage cluster sampling in Tehran. Attachment Security Scale (ASS) was implemented to calculate the divergent validity of ECR-RC.  Results: Results of factor analyze indicated that two factor model of ECR-RC fit in Iranian sample in each relational domain (Mother-Father). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of ECR-RC was above 0.80 and the limit was satisfactory. Furthermore the test-retest reliability of        ECR-RC over a four week period was more than 0.69. Correlation coefficient analysis showed that ECR-RC has a significant negative relationship with ASS which shows the divergent validity.Conclusion: Factor structure, reliability and validity of the ECR-RC for research applications and clinical diagnostics were within acceptable limits. It’s can be said that ECR-RC is useful and reliable tool for attachment researches in different domain of relationship.   Introduction: The investigation of attachment processes during middle childhood and early adolescence has been hampered by a relative lack of measures for this age group.The aim of this study was investigating the psychometric properties of Experiences in Close Relationships Revise-Scale for use with children and adolescents (ECR-RC). It is a self-report questionnaire for measuring attachment anxiety and avoidance.  Method: Sample size of 430 students was selected by stratified multistage cluster sampling in Tehran. Attachment Security Scale (ASS) was implemented to calculate the divergent validity of ECR-RC.  Results: Results of factor analyze indicated that two factor model of ECR-RC fit in Iranian sample in each relational domain (Mother-Father). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of ECR-RC was above 0.80 and the limit was satisfactory. Furthermore the test-retest reliability of        ECR-RC over a four week period was more than 0.69. Correlation coefficient analysis showed that ECR-RC has a significant negative relationship with ASS which shows the divergent validity.Conclusion: Factor structure, reliability and validity of the ECR-RC for research applications and clinical diagnostics were within acceptable limits. It’s can be said that ECR-RC is useful and reliable tool for attachment researches in different domain of relationship.   

Keywords

References

  1. - Huver RM, Otten R, de Vries H, Engels RC. Personality and parenting style in parents of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. 2010;33(3):395-402.
  2. - Bowlby J. By ethology out of psycho-analysis: An experiment in interbreeding. Animal Behaviour. 1980;28(3):649-56.
  3. - Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. New directions in attachment theory and research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2010;27(2):163-72.
  4. - Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR. Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. 1998.
  5. - Brenning K, Soenens B, Braet C, Bosmans G. An adaptation of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Revised for use with children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2011;28(8):1048-72.
  6. - Pooravari M. Comparition of tendency to risky behaviors in the secure/insecure attachment to parents and friends. Master's thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran.2012.
  7. - Allen JP. The attachment system in adolescence. 2008.
  8. - Bowlby J. Atıaehment and Loss (Vol I), Attachment. New York: Basic Books; 1969.
  9. - Kerns KA, Mathews BL, Koehn AJ, Williams CT, Siener-Ciesla S. Assessing both safe haven and secure base support in parent–child relationships. Attachment & human development. 2015;17(4):337-53.
  10. - Hazan C, Zeifman D. Sex and the psychological tether. En K. Bartholomew y D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Ltd; 1994.
  11. - Ainsworth MS. Attachments beyond infancy. American psychologist. 1989;44(4):709.
  12. - Zhang H, Chan DK, Teng F. Transfer of attachment functions and adjustment among young adults in China. The Journal of social psychology. 2011;151(3):257-73.
  13. - DeWall CN, Masten CL, Powell C, Combs D, Schurtz DR, Eisenberger NI. Do neural responses to rejection depend on attachment style? An fMRI study. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2012;7(2):184-92.
  14. - Tambelli R, Laghi F, Odorisio F, Notari V. Attachment relationships and internalizing and externalizing problems among Italian adolescents. Children and youth services review. 2012;34(8):1465-71.
  15. - Duchesne S, Larose S. Adolescent Parental Attachment and Academic Motivation and Performance in Early Adolescence1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2007;37(7):1501-21.
  16. - Kerns KA, Tomich PL, Aspelmeier JE, Contreras JM. Attachment-based assessments of parent–child relationships in middle childhood. Developmental psychology. 2000;36(5):614.
  17. - Pooravari M, Salehi S, Pooravari M. Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of attachment Security (under review).
  18. - Sarvghad S, Rezaei A, Irani F. The relationship between attachment styles and personality characteristics with anxiety. Women's Sociology J. 2013; 3(2):117-136.
  19. - Tasca GA, Szadkowski L, Illing V, Trinneer A, Grenon R, Demidenko N, et al. Adult attachment, depression, and eating disorder symptoms: The mediating role of affect regulation strategies. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009;47(6):662-7.
  20. - Besharat M, Mohammadi Hasel K, Nikfarjam M, Zabihzadeh E, Fallah M. Comparison between patients with depression, anxiety disorders, and normal individuals. Developmental psychology. 2014; 9 (35): 236-227.
International Journal of Behavioral Sciences

Volume 11, Issue 1
Spring 2017
Pages 5-10

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics