Leadership effectiveness, perceived organizational support and work ability: Mediating role of job satisfaction

Authors

Department of Industrial and Oganizational Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Present study tested a model consisting work ability as dependent variable and leadership effectiveness and perceived organizational support as independent variable, with job satisfaction as its mediator. Data were gathered from a sample of 330 employees of an industrial organization in Iran, who were selected by stratified random sampling method. Of this sample, 72 percent were men and average age was 41 years. Fitness of the proposed model was examined through structural equation modeling (SEM), using SPSS-16 and AMOS-16 software packages. The indirect effects were tested using the bootstrap procedure in Preacher and Hayes (2008) SPSS Macro program for mediation. Findings indicated that the proposed model fit the data. Better fit and more meaningful results obtained by adding 1 paths and using AMOS modification indices. The results supported components of the proposed model, in that leadership effectiveness and perceived organizational support predicted job satisfaction, which in turn predicted work ability index. In addition, job satisfaction fully mediated these relationships. Discussion and implications of the results are presented in the study.

Keywords


  1. Rineer JR. Supporting the aging workforce: The impact of psychosocial workplace characteristics on employees' work ability [Dissertation]. Organ: Portland State University;2015.
  2. Ilmarinen J. Towards a longer worklife: Ageing and the quality of worklife in the European Union: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2005.
  3. Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Seitsamo J, editors. New dimensions of work ability. International Congress Series; 2005: Elsevier.
  4. Feldt T, Hyvönen K, Mäkikangas A, Kinnunen U, Kokko K. Development trajectories of Finnish managers' work ability over a 10-year follow-up period. Scandinavian J Work, Environ Health. 2009:37-47.
  5. Beshlideh K, Sheykh Shabani SE. Designing and testing a model of precedents and outcomes of psychological empowerment. J Behav Sci. 2014;8(4):383-94. [Persian]
  6. Hasselhorn HM. Work ability-concept and assessment. Germany: University of Wuppertal. 2008.
  7. Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, editors. Past, present and future of work ability. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Work Ability, Helsinki; 2004.
  8. Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J, Koskinen S. Dimensions of work ability: Eläketurvakeskus; 2008.
  9. Weigl M, Mueller A, Hornung S, Zacher H, Angerer P. The moderating effects of job control and selection, optimization, and compensation strategies on the age–work ability relationship. J Organ Behav. 2013;34(5):607-28.
  10. McGonagle AK, Fisher GG, Barnes-Farrell JL, Grosch JW. Individual and work factors related to perceived work ability and labor force outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(2):376.
  11. Phillips JS, Lord RG. Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1981;28(2):143-63.
  12. Ahmadi-Chegini S, Neisi A, Arshadi N. The relationship of personality and organizational variables with work motivation. J Behav Sci. 2014; 9(2): 147-157. [Persian]
  13. Avolio BJ, Bass BM, Zhu FWW. Multifactor leadership questionnaire: manual and sampler set: Mind Garden Redwood City, CA; 2004.
  14. Näsman O. Metal Age and Kiva-questionnaire. Mediona/The Archipelago Academy for Well-being at Work Finland; 2011.
  15. Eisenberger R, Fasolo P, Davis-LaMastro V. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. J Appl psychol. 1990;75(1):51.
  16. Palermo J, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Walker A, Appannah A. Primary-and secondary-level organizational predictors of work ability. Journal of occupational health psychology. 2013;18(2):220.
  17. DeConinck JB, Stilwell CD. Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions. J Business Res. 2004;57(3):225-31.
  18. Keller AC, Semmer NK. Changes in situational and dispositional factors as predictors of job satisfaction. J Vocat Behav. 2013;83(1):88-98.
  19. Rutherford B, Boles J, Hamwi GA, Madupalli R, Rutherford L. The role of the seven dimensions of job satisfaction in salesperson's attitudes and behaviors. J Business Res. 2009;62(11):1146-51.
  20. Yasaie I, Kh A, Kolivand A. The related study of stress and job satisfaction among air force military pilots. J Behav Sci. 2008;1(2):113-119. [Persian]
  21. Kjellstrand CO, Gard G. Psychosocial health and work ability among staff working with people with cognitive restrictions and intellectual disabilities. Health. 2014;6(18):2481.
  22. Balser DB, Harris MM. Factors affecting employee satisfaction with disability accommodation: a field study. Employee Responsibil Rights J. 2008;20(1):13-28.
  23. Buciuniene I, Blazeviciene A, Bliudziute E. Health care reform and job satisfaction of primary health care physicians in Lithuania. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6(1):10.
  24. Bass BM, Riggio RE. Transformational leadership: Psychology Press; 2006.
  25. Settoon RP, Bennett N, Liden RC. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(3):219.
  26. Hekman DR, Bigley GA, Steensma HK, Hereford JF. Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Academ Manage J. 2009;52(3):506-26.
  27. Andrews F, S. W. Social indicators of Well-Being. New York: Plenum Press; 1976.
  28. Rentsch JR, Steel RP. Construct and concurrent validation of the Andrews and Withey Job Satisfaction Questionnaire. Educ Psychol Measur. 1992;52(2):357-67.
  29. Evans MG. The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1970;5(3):277-98.
  30. Burke RJ. Nursing staff attitudes following restructuring: the role of perceived organizational support, restructuring processes and stressors. Int J Soc Soc Policy. 2003;23(8/9):129-57.
  31. Miao R-T. Perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, task performance and organizational citizenship behavior in China. J Behav Appl Manage. 2011;12(2):105.
  32. Mohammad Mosadegh Rad A, Hossein Yarmohammadian M. A study of relationship between managers' leadership style and employees' job satisfaction. Leadership Health Services. 2006;19(2):11-28.
  33. Ilardi BC, Leone D, Kasser T, Ryan RM. Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1993;23(21):1789-805.