International Journal of Behavioral Sciences

International Journal of Behavioral Sciences

The Relationship between Innovativeness and Cognitive Ability in Rhinoplasty Candidates with the Mediating Role of Cognitive Distortion

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Fatteme Raiisi 1
Seyedeh-Irandokht Senobar-Tahaei 2
1 Cognitive Science of Language Department, Institute of Cognitive Science, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Psychology and Counselling, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran
10.30491/ijbs.2024.446081.2083
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to find the relationship between innovativeness and cognitive ability in rhinoplasty candidates with the mediating role of cognitive distortion via the Bootstrap approach.
Method: The correlation research method was path analysis. The statistical population included all rhinoplasty candidates in Iran from August 2022 until May 2023. In this study, 320 people who were candidates for cosmetic rhinoplasty were selected via the available method. They completed the Innovativeness Questionnaire (1990), the Cognitive Abilities Questionnaire (2013), and the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale (2004) through Google form due to the Covid-19 outbreak. For data analysis, SPSS-21 and Amos software were used.
Results: The results showed that innovativeness had a direct effect on cognitive ability (t=2.52; ß=0.60) and cognitive distortion (t=2.09; ß=0.45), but cognitive distortion had an inverse effect on cognitive ability (t =1.99; ß=-0.40). The bootstrap test results indicated that cognitive distortion had a negative role as a mediator between innovativeness and cognitive ability.
Conclusion: By examining the underlying cognitive and psychological factors of a tendency to rhinoplasty, it is suggested that cognitive interventions should be conducted on all candidates for cosmetic surgeries to prevent unnecessary rhinoplasty candidates by creating modified cognitive schemas.
Keywords
Innovativeness
Cognitive Distortion
Cognitive Ability
Rhinoplasty
  1. Lăzărescu G-M, Vintilă M. The relationship between personality traits and willingness to undergo cosmetic surgery in the non-clinical population – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241952.
  2. Tajally R, Mechi F, khoshsirat s. Predicting the Tendency towards Rhinoplasty Based on Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder and Body image. Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery. 2021;7(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.22037/orlfps.v7i1.3611
  3. Shauly O, Calvert J, Stevens G, Rohrich R, Villanueva N, Gould DJ. Assessment of Wellbeing and Anxiety-related Disorders in Those Seeking Rhinoplasty: A Crowdsourcing-based Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(4):e2737. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002737
  4. Zojaji R, Sobhani E, Meshkat M, Javanbakht M. Quality of life after cosmetic rhinoplasty in Iran: A systematic review. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2018;20(5):265-9. Doi:  10.22038/JFMH.2018.11326.
  5. Funakoshi Y, Saito M, Kawaguchi K, Hiramatsu E, Yamamoto N, Hondo Y, et al. Investigation of Patients' Motivation for Cosmetic Surgery in a Nationwide Cosmetic Surgery Group. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(1):e5458. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005458.
  6. Al-Halabi B, Vassiliou M, Gilardino M. Teaching and Assessing Cognitive Competencies in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(2):455e-64e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009295.
  7. Căiță GA, Maghiar T, Bodog FD, Lascu CF, Voiţă-Mekereş F, Noor H. Sociological Study of the Influencing Factors on the Trend Toward Cosmetic Surgery. Archives of Pharmacy Practice. 2023;14(2):122-6. anyrecover-mac_installer.zip
  8. Tavakoli Z, Ghadampour E, Bagherim N, Tanha Z. Comparison of the efficacy of positive psychotherapy and schema therapy on cognitive flexibility and physical self-esteem in women seeking cosmetic surgery. Journal of Psychological Science. 2022;21(115):1443-62. doi:10.52547/JPS.21.115.1443.
  9. Hong JP. Innovation in plastic surgery-why and how? Arch Plast Surg, 2021; 48(5):471-472. doi: 10.5999/aps.2021.01669. doi: 10.5999/aps.2021.01669.
  10. Venkatraman MP, Price LL. Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: Concepts, measurement, and implications. Journal of Business Research, 1990;20(4):293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90008-2.
  11. Barlach L. The Mindset of Innovation: Contributions of Cognitive and Social Psychology. Journal of Psychological Researc, 2021, 3(4), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v3i4.3480.
  12. Süer S, Kinay I. Investigation of Relationship between Prospective Teachers’ Need for Cognition Level and Individual Innovativeness State. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2019; 11(3), 1-12. DOI : 10.15345/iojes.2019.03.001
  13. Wathanakom N, Khlaisang J, Songkram N. The study of the causal relationship between innovativeness and entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate students. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2020;9(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00125-5
  14. Melanie P, Ramsey LR, Richey RG. Expatriates’ international opportunity recognition and innovativeness: The role of metacognitive and cognitive cultural intelligence, Journal of World Business, 2018; 53(2): 222-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.004.
  15. Sharif F, Anooshehpoor B, Mani A, Zarshenas L, Zare N, Haghighatian A. Comparison of the Temperament and Character of Patients Referred to Cosmetic Nasal Surgeon in Shiraz Hospitals, 2015. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery, 2016;4(2):137-47. https://ijcbnm.sums.ac.ir/article_40738.html
  16. Batra S, Vohra N. Exploring the linkages of cognitive style and individual innovativeness", Management Research Review, 2016, 39(7): 768-785. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2014-0047
  17. Summers BJ, Schwartzberg AC, Wilhelm S. A virtual reality study of cognitive biases in body dysmorphic disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2021;130(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000563
  18. Wang B, Zhao Y, Lu X, Qin B. Cognitive distortion based explainable depression detection and analysis technologies for the adolescent internet users on social media. Front Public Health, 2023, 17(10):1045777. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045777.
  19. Wuth A, Mishra S, Beshai S. Feeney J. Experiences of developmental unpredictability and harshness predict adult cognition: An examination of maladaptive schemas, positive schemas, and cognitive distortions. Curr Psychol, 2022, 41, 7155–7165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01274-2.
  20. Sun MD, Rieder EA. Psychosocial issues and body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetics: Review and debate. Clin Dermatol, 2022;40(1):4-10. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.08.008.
  21. Omar A, Eid M, Ali R.  Gawad A, El Missiry M, El Ghoneimy S. Psychiatric morbidity among Egyptian patients seeking rhinoplasty. Middle East Curr Psychiatry, 2019;26(8): https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-019-0008-5.
  22. Kazei DD, Lin SJ. Discussion: Reevaluating the Current Model of Rhinoplasty Training and Future Directions: A Role for Focused, Maneuver-Specific Simulation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(4):606e-607e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005987
  23. Ghorbani A, Piroozi B, Safari H, Shokri A, Aqaei A, Yousefi F, et al. Prevalence of elective cosmetic surgery and its relationship with socioeconomic and mental health: A cross-sectional study in west of Iran. Health Sci Rep. 2022,17;5(6):e872. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.872.
  24. Jones H, Faulkner H, Losken A, The Psychological Impact of Aesthetic Surgery: A Mini-Review. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum, 2022, 4:ojac077, https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojac077
  25. Selya AS, Rose JS, Dierker LC, Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ. A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen's f(2), a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED. Front Psychol, 2012, 17(3):111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111.
  26. Jafarian M, Askari M. Comparison Cognitive Distortions and Cognitive Emotion Regulation in Addicts and non-Addicts. Rooyesh, 2019; 7(11) :259-272. Doi: ‎ 20.1001.1.2383353.1397.7.11.3.2.
  27. Hamamci Z, Büyüköztürk S. The Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale: development and psychometric characteristics. Psychol Rep, 2004; 95(1):291-303. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.1.291-303.
  28. EsmaeelPoor Kh, Bakhshi Poor Rodsari K. Mohammadzadegan R. Determining factor structure, validity and reliability of interpersonal cognitive distortions scale among students of Tabriz University. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 2015;2(3):53-72. (Persian). https://asj.basu.ac.ir/article_1020.html?lang=en.
  29. Nejati V. Cognitive Abilities Questionnaire: Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties. Advances in Cognitive Sciences. 2013;15(2):11-9. (Persian). URL: http://icssjournal.ir/article-1-289-fa.html
  30. Wang Y, Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Applying the concepts of innovation strategies to plastic surgery. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2013;132(2):483–490. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958c9a
  31. Rashidi S, Gholami M, Ranjbaripour T. Predictors of Tendency Toward Cosmetic Surgery Based on Histrionic Personality Disorder Features & Cognitive Emotion Regulation Among Women with Academic Education. JNIP, 2022;12(16):1-13. (Persian). URL: http://jnip.ir/article-1-694-fa.html.
  32. Borujeni LA, Pourmotabed S, Abdoli Z, Ghaderi H, Mahmoodnia L, Sedehi M, Hasanpour Dehkordi A. A Comparative Analysis of Patients' Quality of Life, Body Image and Self-confidence Before and After Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(2):483-490. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01559-3.
  33. Fingeret MC, Nipomnick SW, Crosby MA, Reece GP. Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction. Cancer treatment reviews. 2013;39(6):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.12.010.
  34. Moore E, Adams H, Ellis T, Thibault P, Sullivan MJL. Assessing catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(3):317-22. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1254283
  35. Eskelinen A, Kanervo R. Creativity and innovativeness as future skills. International Academy of Technology, Education and Development, 2019; 239:696-701. doi:10.21125/iceri.2019.0220.
  36. Rashidi S, Gholami M, Ranjbaripour T. Predictors Of Tendency Toward Cosmetic Surgery Based On Histrionic Personality Disorder Features & Cognitive Emotion Regulation Among Women With Academic Education. journal of Psychology new Ideas. 2022;12(16):1-13. (Persian). URL: http://jnip.ir/article-1-694-fa.html.
  37. Farid M, Nikkhah D, Little M, Edwards D, Needham W, Shibu M. Complications of Cosmetic Surgery Abroad - Cost Analysis and Patient Perception. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(6):e2281. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002281
  38. Gellatly R, Beck AT. Catastrophic thinking: A transdiagnostic process across psychiatric disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2016;40(4):441-52. anyrecover-mac_installer.zip

 

 

International Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Volume 18, Issue 2
Summer 2024
Pages 104-110