1. Paul N GM. Relationship between internet self-efficacy and internet anxiety: A nuanced approach to understanding the connection. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2017;31;33(4), 42-53.
2. Ozturk FO EM, Ozturk O, Canan F. . The relationship of affective temperament and emotional-behavioral difficulties to internet addiction in Turkish teenagers. ISRN psychiatry. 2013;28; 23-37.
3. Li D ZW, Li X, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Wang Y. Stressful life events and adolescent Internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction and the moderating role of coping style. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;1;63:408-415.
4. Chou C LY. The moderating effects of internet parenting styles on the relationship between Internet parenting behavior, Internet expectancy, and Internet addiction tendency. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 2017;1;26(3-4):137-146.
5. Tahmassian K GM. The relationship between self-efficacy and peer rejection in adolescents. Modern Psychological Research. 2009;4, 14, 107-123.
6. Allen A K-DL, Katsikitis M. . Problematic internet pornography use: The role of craving, desire thinking, and metacognition. Addictive behaviors. 2017;1;70:65-71.
7. Fergus TA SM. Cyberchondria: Examining relations with problematic Internet use and metacognitive beliefs. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. 2017;24(6):1322-1330.
8. Duman B SÇ. The Effect of a Metacognition-Based Instructional Practice on the Metacognitive Awareness of the Prospective Teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2019;7(3):720-728.
9. Garrison DR AZ. Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education. 2015;1;24:66-71.
10. Imuta K HJ, Slaughter V, Selcuk B, Ruffman T. . Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental psychology. 2016;52(8):1192-1201.
11. Soto C dBA, Jacovina M, McNamara D, Benson N, Riffo B. . Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education. 2019;1;6(1):156-167.
12. Izadi S HM, Ahmadabadi NM. . Explaining the Attitude towards Mathematics in Students on the Basis of Goal Adjustment Strategies and Metacognitive Beliefs. Creative Education. 2018;5;9(07):10-42.
13. Baptista J OA, Martins EC, Verissimo M, Martins C. . Does social–behavioral adjustment mediate the relation between executive function and academic readiness?. . Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2016;1;46:22-30.
14. Pham YK MC. Social relationships among adolescents with disabilities: Unique and cumulative associations with adjustment. Exceptional Children. 2016;82(2):234-250.
15. Przybylski AK MA. How the quantity and quality of electronic gaming relates to adolescents’ academic engagement and psychosocial adjustment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 2016;5(2):145-152.
16. Yang CC RA. Not necessarily detrimental: Two social comparison orientations and their associations with social media use and college social adjustment. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;1;84:49-57.
17. Dehghanpour N TG, Masihie, F. . Predicting the Use of Virtual Networks Based on Social Adjustment and Emotion Control in Adolescents. Media Studies. 2018;13, 1 (40), 40-49.
18. S. K. Gender differences and relationship between internet addiction and perceived social self-efficacy among adolescents. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing. 2018;1;9(1), 69-73.
19. Spada MM MC. Metacognitions and emotion regulation as predictors of problematic internet use in adolescents. Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 2017;1;14(1):59-63.
20. Chuang SC LF, Tsai CC. . An exploration of the relationship between Internet self-efficacy and sources of Internet self-efficacy among Taiwanese university students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;1;48:147-155.
21. Lavrijsen J SB, Verschueren K. . Perfectionism, school burnout and engagement: a comparison of gifted and non-gifted students. In16th conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence 2018.
22. DH. J. Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments: Routledge; 2010.
23. J. H. The impact of teachers' perceptions and their instructionalpractices on reading engagement of typical and giftedstudents in grades 3-5. St. John's University (New York). School of Education and Human Services. 2016.
24. Beckmann E MA. Non-cognitive characteristics of gifted students with learning disabilities: An in-depth systematic review. Frontiers in psychology. 2018;20;9:504-515.
25. Worrell FC SR, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Dixson DD. . Gifted students. Annual review of psychology. 2019;4;70:551-576.
26. Kohan-Mass J TL. Differences in self-efficacy beliefs between girls in the top 1.5% and the top 3% in general cognitive ability who participate in gifted programs. Gifted Education International. 2019;35(1):20-36.
27. Agaliotis I KE. Motivational Differences of Greek Gifted and Non-Gifted High-Achieving and Gifted Under-Achieving Students. International Education Studies. 2019;12(2):45-56.
28. RB. K. Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. 2010.
29. Mojardi V IA, Jamal S. . Investigating the Status of Using Virtual Social Networks among Students of North Khorasan Province. North Khorasan Police Knowledge Quarterly. 2014;1 (4): 99-85.
30. Sherer M AC. Construct validation of the self-efficacy scale. Psychological reports. 1983;53(3):899-902.
31. Barati Bakhtiari S. Investigating the simple and multivariate relationship between self-efficacy, self-efficacy and self-esteem with academic performance in students, Master Thesis in Psychology 1997.
32. Thorpe LP, Clark, W. W., & Tiegs, E. W. . Manual: California test . Los Angeles: California Test Bureau1953.
33. Khodayari Fard M NM, Ghobari Bona, B. . Final report of the research project under the auspices of the Oppressed and Veterans of the Islamic Revolution. 2002.
34. Hajloo N. The relationship of perfectionism, self-efficacy, conscientiousness and stress with procrastination. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2013;6(4): 307-314.
35. Koohsali M. comparison of social adjustment in mothers with and without of educable mentally retarded daughter. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2008;2(2): 165-172.