Potential Predictors of Psychological Distress During Nationwide Covid-19 Quarantine: An Exploratory Study

Document Type: Original Article

Author

Department of Psychology, M.O.P.Vaishnav College for Women, Affiliated to University of Madras, Chennai-40, India.

10.30491/ijbs.2020.229741.1263

Abstract

Abstract
Introduction: As the world is navigating unchartered territories on account of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), mental health professionals face grimmer challenges. In line with this, the present study aims to explore the potential risk factors that may exacerbate psychological distress among quarantined residents of Chennai city (Tamil Nadu, India).
Method: A descriptive correlational research design was employed. The sample comprised of 231 individuals. Five standardised tools were employed to capture different psychological variables: (i) Body Vigilance Scale (ii) Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale- Revised (iii) Fatalism Scale (iv) Death Anxiety Scale- Revised and (v) Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.
Results: It was found that nearly 42% of the population was experiencing mild to severe psychological distress due to the COVID-19 quarantine. Exploration of various psychological variables showed that death anxiety, disgust sensitivity, and perception of luck are significant predictors of psychological distress in the prevailing situation.
Conclusion: The results of the present study emphasize the need to move beyond the obvious factors that impair well-being during nationwide shutdowns to subtler, personality related factors such as sense of control and anxiety that can worsen mental health.

Keywords


References
  1. Taylor S. The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2019
  2. Scheidel W. The Great leveller: Violence and the history of inequality from the stone age to the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press. 2017; ISBN 978-0691165028.
    1. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
    2. Horesh D, Brown AD. Traumatic stress in the age of COVID-19: A call to close critical gaps and adapt to new realities. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2020;12(4): 331-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tra0000592
    3. Sibley CG, Greaves LM, Satherley N, Wilson MS, Overall NC, Lee CH. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. 2020; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000662
    4. Blakey SM, Abramowitz JS. Psychological Predictors of Health Anxiety in Response to the Zika Virus. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 2017; 24(3): 270- 278. doi:10.1007/s10880-017-9514-y 
    5. Thompson RR, Garfin DR, Holman EA, Silver RC. Distress, Worry, and Functioning Following a Global Health Crisis: A National Study of Americans’ Responses to Ebola. Clinical Psychological Science. 2017; 5(3): 513–521. doi:10.1177/2167702617692030 
    6. Mohammed A, Sheikh TL, Gidado S, Poggensee G, Nguku P, Olayinka, Obiako RO. An evaluation of psychological distress and social support of survivors and contacts of Ebola virus disease infection and their relatives in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross sectional study − 2014. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2167-6 
    7. Kissler SM, Tedijanto C, Goldsteein E, Grad YH, Lipsitch M. Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science. Advance online publication. 2020; 368 (6493):860-868. doi: 10.1126/science.abb5793
    8. Huffington A. Interview by Fareed Zacharia. Global Public Square. 2020
    9. Schmidt NB, Lerew DR, Trakowski JH. Body Vigilance in Panic Disorder: Evaluating Attention to Bodily Perturbations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology. 2008; 65(2): 214-220.
    10. Olatunji BO, Cisler JM, Deacon BJ, Connolly K, Lohr JM. The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2007; 21(7): 918–930. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.005 
    11. Ojserkis R, Taboas W, McKay D. Disgust in Psychopathology. Treatments for Psychological Problems and Syndromes. 2017; 480-503. doi:10.1002/9781118877142.ch30 
    12. Badour C, Feldner M. The Role of Disgust in Posttraumatic Stress: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature. Psychopathology Review. 2016; doi:10.5127/pr.032813 
    13. Hayes J, Clerk L. Fatalism in the Fight against COVID-19: Implications for Mitigation and Mental Health. 2020; doi: 10.31219/osf.io/t6zmv.
    14. UNICEF. Key Messages and Actions for COVID-19 Prevention and Control in Schools UNICEF/UNI220408/Pacific. 2020
    15. Pyszczynski T. The Role of Death in Life: Exploring the Interface Between Terror Management Theory and Evolutionary Psychology. In Evolutionary Perspectives on Death. 2019; 1-24
    16. Cable D. Coping with ‘Death Awareness’ in the COVID-19 Era. Scientific American. 2020. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coping-with-death-awareness-in-the-covid-19-era/
    17. Farley H. Promoting self‚Äźefficacy in patients with chronic disease beyond traditional education: A literature review. Nursing Open. 2019; 1-12. doi: 10.1002/nop2.382
    18. Shen L, Condit CM, Wright L. The psychometric property and validation of a fatalism scale. Psychology & Health. 2009; 24(5): 597–613. doi:10.1080/08870440801902535 
    19. Templer DI. The Construction and Validation of a Death Anxiety Scale. The Journal of General Psychology.1970 (revised and republished 2016); 82(2), 165–177. doi:10.1080/00221309.1970.9920634 
    20. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine. 2002; 32: 959-956
    21. Hussain W. Role of Social Media in COVID-19 Pandemic. The International Journal of Frontier Sciences. 2020; doi: 4.10.37978/tijfs.v4i2.144.
    22. McKay D, Yang H, Elhai, J, Asmundson G. (2020). Anxiety Regarding Contracting COVID-19 Related to Interoceptive Anxiety Sensations: The Moderating Role of Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102233
    23. Dasson B. Deaths, Fear of Covid-19 Creating Anxiety, But There is Social Support: NIMHANS Director. News 18. 2020 April 30
    24. Rajagopalan RP. The danger of China’s maritime aggression amid COVID-19. Observer Research foundation. 2020; https://www.orfonline.org/research/the-danger-of-chinas-maritime-aggression-amid-covid-19-64423/