References:
1. Skinner EA, Wellborn JG, Connell JP. What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1990;82(1):22-32.
2. Connell JP, Wellborn JG. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. Self processes and development. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 23. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1991. p. 43-77.
3. Skinner EA, Kindermann TA, Furrer CJ. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2009;69(3):493-525.
4. Reeve J. A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media; 2012. p. 149-72.
5. Skinner EA, Pitzer JR. Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media; 2012. p. 21-44.
6. Reeve J, Tseng C-M. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2011;36:257-67.
7. Reeve J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013;105(3):579-95.
8. Reeve J, Deci E, Ryan R. Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation and learning. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation. information Age; 2004. p.31-60.
9. Deci E, Ryan R. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985.
10. Patall EA, Pituch KA, Steingut RR, Vasquez AC, Yates N, Kennedy AAU. Agency and high school science students' motivation, engagement, and classroom support experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2019;62:77-92.
11. Hospel V, Galand B. Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction. 2016;41:1-10.
12. Wang M-T, Eccles JS. School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction. 2013;28:12-23.
13. Earl SR, Taylor IM, Meijen C, Passfield L. Autonomy and competence frustration in young adolescent classrooms: Different associations with active and passive disengagement. Learning and Instruction. 2017;49:32-40.
14. Chatzisarantis NLD, Ada EN, Ahmadi M, Caltabiano N, Wang D, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, et al. Differential effects of perceptions of equal, favourable and unfavourable autonomy support on educational and well-being outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2019;58:33-43.
15. Assor A. Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy. Handbook of research on student engagement: Springer; 2012. p. 421-39.
16. Pekrun R, Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Academic emotions and student engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media; 2012. p. 259-82.
17. King RB, McInerney DM, Ganotice Jr FA, Villarosa JB. Positive affect catalyzes academic engagement: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Learning and Individual Differences. 2015;39:64-72.
18. Pekrun R. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review. 2006;18(4):315-41.
19. Ellis H, Ashbrook P. W.(1988). Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. Affect, cognition, and social behainor: New evidence and integratii'e attempts, 1988. p. 25-43.
20. Schwarz N, Clore GL. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 1996. p. 433-65.
21. Muis K, Pekrun R, Sinatra G, Azevedo R, Trevors G, Vogl E, et al. The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction. 2015.;39:168-83.
22. Tulis M, Fulmer SM. Students' motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic challenge in mathematics and reading. Learning and Individual Differences. 2013;27:35-46.
23. Zhen R, Liu R-D, Ding Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Xu L. The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences. 2017;54:210-6.
24. Altuwairqi K, Jarraya SK, Allinjawi A, Hammami M. A new emotion–based affective model to detect student’s engagement. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. 2018.
25. Garn AC, Simonton K, Dasingert T, Simonton A. Predicting changes in student engagement in university physical education: Application of control-value theory of achievement emotions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2017;29:93-102.
26. Kwon K, Kupzyk K, Benton A. Negative emotionality, emotion regulation, and achievement: Cross-lagged relations and mediation of academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences. 2018;67:33-40.
27. AminAbadi Z. Examining the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in the relationship between perceived parenting style dimensions and academic achievement. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2011;5(2):109-17.
28. Moltafet G. The relationship between student perception of teacher’s behavioral style and psychological well-being. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2012;6(3):263-70.
29. Tze V, Klassen R, Daniels L. Patterns of Boredom and Its Relationship With Perceived Autonomy Support and Engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2014;39:175-187.
30. Federici RA, Skaalvik EM. Students' Perceptions of Emotional and Instrumental Teacher Support: Relations with Motivational and Emotional Responses. International Education Studies. 2014;7:21-36.
31. Van Ryzin MJ. Protective factors at school: Reciprocal effects among adolescents’ perceptions of the school environment, engagement in learning, and hope. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2011;40(12):1568-80.
32. Yu C, Li X, Wang S, Zhang W. Teacher autonomy support reduces adolescent anxiety and depression: An 18-month longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence. 2016;49:115-23.
33. Ketonen EE, Dietrich J, Moeller J, Salmela-Aro K, Lonka K. The role of daily autonomous and controlled educational goals in students’ academic emotion states: An experience sampling method approach. Learning and Instruction. 2018;53:10-20.
34. Assor A, Kaplan H, Roth G. Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy‐enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British journal of educational psychology. 2002;72(2):261-78.
35. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP. Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational psychologist. 2002;37(2):91-105.
36. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist. 2001;56(3):218.
37. Fredrickson BL. Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in experimental social psychology. 47: Elsevier; 2013. p. 1-53.
)