The relationship between personality factors, self-control and marital coping strategies with marital conflict

Authors

1 Department of Counseling, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan, Iran

2 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Conflict is inevitable in intimate relationship in the form of disagreements, dislikes, arguments and tensions. It may result in the renovation if handled properly or deterioration of relationship if managed poorly. The aim of this descriptive- correlation study was to investigate the effects of marital coping strategies, personality and self-control on the marital conflict in a propositional structural model. Methods: The research population consisted of all the parents of elementary school children in Kurdistan in 2014. The two-stage cluster sampling was used. The research instruments were the Marital Conflict Questionnaire (MCQ), NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI, short form), Self- control questionnaire & Marital Coping Inventory (MCI). Required data was collected through research instruments. Correlation analysis, multiple regression and structural equation model was done using AMOS22. Results: The results showed that self- control, personality and marital coping strategies had effects on marital conflict and can predict it. Marital coping strategies have the strongest effect on marital conflict among these variables (-0.74). Conceptual model showed that personality factor had strong effects on marital coping strategies (-0.43) & self- control (-.89).Conclusions: Besides specifying the relationship among research variables, the results indicated that personality factor can affect marital conflict through self – control & marital coping strategies. Considering that personality traits are resistant to change and modification, it seems that family therapists can moderate the effects of personality & reduce marital conflict by intervening on self – control & marital coping strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. Dildar S, Sitwat A, Yasin S. Intimate Enemies: Marital Conflicts and Conflict Resolution Styles in Dissatisfied Married Couples. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2013;15(10):1433-9.
  2. Faulkner RA. Gender-related influences on marital satisfaction and marital conflict over time for husbands and wives: University of Georgia; 2002.
  3. Butt MS, Jamal H. Determinants of marital fertility in Pakistan: an application of the "synthesis framework". Pakistan Dev Rev. 1993;32(2):199-220.
  4. Lim BKH. Conflict resolution styles, somatization, and marital satisfaction in Chinese couples: The moderating effect of forgiveness and willingness to seek professional help: Texas Tech University; 2000.
  5. Kurdek LA. The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first 10 years of marriage. Dev Psychol. 1999;35(5):1283-96.
  6. Horrocks AM. Financial Management Practices and Conflict Management Styles of Couples in Great Marriages: Utah State University; 2010.
  7. Gottman JM, Levenson RW. Rebound from marital conflict and divorce prediction. Fam Process. 1999;38(3):287-92.
  8. Gottman JM, Levenson RW, Swanson C, Swanson K, Tyson R, Yoshimoto D. Observing gay, lesbian and heterosexual couples' relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflict interaction. J Homosexual. 2003;45(1):65-91.
  9. Isanejad O, Ahmadi A, Etemadi O, Qaderpour R. The Study of the effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital coping strategies of couples in Isfahan. J Res Behav Sci. 2011;9(1):1-12. [Persian]
  10. Herzberg PY. Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013;26(2):136-53.
  11. Amiri M, Farhoodi F, Abdolvand N, Bidakhavidi AR. A study of the relationship between Big-five personality traits and communication styles with marital satisfaction of married students majoring in public universities of Tehran. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2011;30:685-9.
  12. Decuyper M, De Bolle M, De Fruyt F. Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relation. 2012;19(1):128-45.
  13. Craig RJ, Olson RE. 16 PF profiles and typologies for patients seen in marital therapy. Psychol Reports. 1995;77(1):187-94.
  14. Kaufman G, Bernhardt E. His and Her Job: What Matters Most for Fertility Plans and Actual Childbearing? Fam Relations. 2012;61(4):686-97.
  15. Shiota MN, Levenson RW. Birds of a feather don't always fly farthest: similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychol Aging. 2007;22(4):666-75.
  16. Luo S, Klohnen EC. Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: a couple-centered approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88(2):304-26.
  17. Donnellan MB, Conger RD, Bryant CM. The Big Five and enduring marriages. J Res Pers. 2004;38(5):481-504.
  18. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Morgan SP, Hossein-Chavoshi M, McDonald P. Family Change and Continuity in Iran: Birth Control Use Before First Pregnancy. J Marriage Fam. 2009;71(5):1309-24.
  19. Whisman MA. Marital distress and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders in a population-based national survey. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116(3):638-43.
  20. Jalili F, Bakhshaiesh AR, Farsinejad M. Study the relation between personality traits and spouse violence. 5th congress of Islamic counseling; Qom, Iran. Iran: Institution of Islamic Counseling; 1999. p. 231-7.
  21. Bogg T, Roberts BW. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(6):887.
  22. Roshan R, Alinaghi A, Sanaie B, Meliani M. Study the effectiveness of self- regulation based couple therapy on marital adjustment. J Fam Psychother Counsel. 2010;2(3):222-33.
  23. Sanaie B. Scales of Family and couples assessment. Tehran: Beisat Publication; 1998. Persian
  24. Costa PT, McCrae, RR. Professional Manual: Revised NEO. Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). NewYork: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 1992.
  25. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004;72(2):271-324.
  26. Isanejad O. Comparing the effectiveness of relationship enhancement (RE) and cognitive behavioral couples therapy (CBCT) on marital quality, marital coping strategies and stress in breast cancer survivorships[Dissertation]. Iran: University of Isfahan; 2013. [Persian]
  27. Van der Linden D, Te Nijenhuis J, Bakker AB. The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. J Res Person. 2010;44(3):315-27.
  28. Rushton JP, Bons TA, Hur Y-M. The genetics and evolution of the general factor of personality. J Res Pers. 2008;42(5):1173-85.
  29. Kaushal R, Kwantes CT. The role of culture and personality in choice of conflict management strategy. Int J Intercultural Relations. 2006;30(5):579-603.
  30. Shahmoradi S. Predicting marital conflict based on personality traits and demographic characters of couples[Dissertation]. Iran: University of Isfahan; 2011. Persian
  31. Kurdek LA. Change in relationship quality for partners from lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual couples. J Fam Psychol. 2008;22(5):701-11.
  32. Bodenmann G, Pihet S, Kayser K. The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: a 2-year longitudinal study. J Fam Psychol. 2006;20(3):485-93.
  33. Murray SL, Rose P, Bellavia GM, Holmes JG, Kusche AG. When rejection stings: how self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83(3):556.
  34. Bodenmann G. Dyadic Coping and Its Significance for Marital Functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser, K. E., and Bodenmann, G. E, editor. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping: American Psychological Association; 2005.
  35. Farzin-Rad B, Asgharnejad Farid AA, Yekke-Yazdandoost R, Habibi-Asgarabad M. Comparison of copying strategies and personality styles in depressed and non-depressed students. J Behav Sci. 2010;4(1):5-6. [Persian]
International Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Volume 9, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
52
January 2016
Pages 233-239

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics