Comparison of the Effectiveness of Attentional Bias Modification, Approach Bias Modification and their Combination on Cognitive Bias and Relapse in Methamphetamine Abusers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Methamphetamine abuse has been growing during the past decade. Recent studies show that computerized training intervention can be useful. The present study compared a variety of cognitive bias modification methods (i.e., attention bias modification, approach bias modification and their combination) on attention bias, approach bias and relapse among methamphetamine abusers.
Method: A total of 108 patients were recruited as the primary sample and the obtained data from 97 patients were analyzed in the final analysis. After being matched according to demographical characteristics, participants were assessed for cognitive bias and relapse to measure the baseline. Afterwards, they were randomly assigned to three different training conditions receiving eight training sessions and a control condition. Finally, all participants underwent a post-assessment similar to the pre-assessment.
Results: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) indicated significant reduction both in cognitive bias and relapse in the experimental conditions compared to the control condition. Post-hoc tests suggested no significant differences in relapse in the experimental groups. Furthermore, attention bias decreased in groups after Attention Bias Modification (ABM) and approach bias decreased in the groups which received Approach Avoidance Task (AAT-T).
Conclusion: It can be suggested that different treatments of cognitive bias modification, by reducing cognitive bias and relapse, could be beneficial for methamphetamine abusers.
 
 

Keywords

References

References
1.   Courtney KE, Ray LA. Methamphetamine: an update on epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical phenomenology, and treatment literature. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2014;143:11-21.
2.   Palamar J. How ephedrine escaped regulation in the United States: a historical review of misuse and associated policy. Health Policy. 2011;99(1):1-9.
3.   Rasmussen N. Chapter two-amphetamine-type stimulants: the early history of their medical and non-medical uses. International review of neurobiology. 2015;120:9-25.
4.   United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) O. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Crime and criminal justice statistics. 2012.
5.   Morley KC, Cornish JL, Faingold A, Wood K, Haber PS. Pharmacotherapeutic agents in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2017;26(5):563-78.
6.   Merz F. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: World Drug Report 2017. 2017. SIRIUS–Zeitschrift für Strategische Analysen. 2018;2(1):85-6.
7.   Passaro A, Soavi C, Marusic U, Rejc E, Sanz JM, Morieri ML, et al. Computerized cognitive training and brain derived neurotrophic factor during bed rest: mechanisms to protect individual during acute stress. Aging (Albany NY). 2017;9(2):393.
8.   UNODC O. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Crime and criminal justice statistics. 2015.
9.   Ahmadi-Jouibari T, Fattahi N, Shamsipur M. Rapid extraction and determination of amphetamines in human urine samples using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and solidification of floating organic drop followed by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. 2014;94:145-51.
10. Alaee A, Zarghami M, Farnia S, Khademloo M, Khoddad T. Comparison of brain white matter hyperintensities in methamphetamine and methadone dependent patients and healthy controls. Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2014;11(2).
11. Mohajerin B, Dolatshahi B, Shahbaz AP, Farhoudian A. Differences between expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal in opioids and stimulant dependent patients. International journal of high risk behaviors & addiction. 2013;2(1):8.
12. Solhi H, Malekirad A, Mohammad Kazemifar A, Sharifi F. Oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in prolonged users of methamphetamine. Drug metabolism letters. 2013;7(2):79-82.
13. O'brien CP, Gardner EL. Critical assessment of how to study addiction and its treatment: human and non-human animal models. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2005;108(1):18-58.
14. Dias NR, Schmitz JM, Rathnayaka N, Red SD, Sereno AB, Moeller FG, et al. Anti-saccade error rates as a measure of attentional bias in cocaine dependent subjects. Behavioural brain research. 2015;292:493-9.
15. Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW. Reaching out towards cannabis: approach‐bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction. 2011;106(9):1667-74.
16. Cisler JM, Koster EH. Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical psychology review. 2010;30(2):203-16.
17. Stacy AW, Wiers RW. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual review of clinical psychology. 2010;6:551-75.
18. Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nature neuroscience. 2005;8(11):1458-63.
19. Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental cognitive neuroscience. 2011;1(4):364-76.
20. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2008;363(1507):3137-46.
21. Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof KR. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: Mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clinical Psychological Science. 2013;1(2):192-212.
22. Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2008;97(1-2):1-20.
23. Rooke SE, Hine DW, Thorsteinsson EB. Implicit cognition and substance use: A meta-analysis. Addictive behaviors. 2008;33(10):1314-28.
24. Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Duka T. Explicit knowledge of stimulus–outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour. Psychopharmacology. 2005;177(4):428-37.
25. Nikolaou K, Field M, Critchley H, Duka T. Acute alcohol effects on attentional bias are mediated by subcortical areas associated with arousal and salience attribution. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(7):1365-73.
26. Kavanagh DJ, Andrade J, May J. Beating the urge: Implications of research into substance-related desires. Addictive Behaviors. 2004;29(7):1359-72.
27. Kosten TR, Scanley BE, Tucker KA, Oliveto A, Prince C, Sinha R, et al. Cue-induced brain activity changes and relapse in cocaine-dependent patients. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(3):644-50.
28. Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Pothos EM. The addiction-stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychological bulletin. 2006;132(3):443-76.
29. Franken IH. Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2003;27(4):563-79.
30. Wiers RW, Field M, Stacy AW. Passion’s slave?: Conscious and unconscious cognitive processes in alcohol and drug abuse. The Oxford handbook of substance use and substance use disorders. 2016;1:311-50.
31. Marissen MA, Franken IH, Waters AJ, Blanken P, Van Den Brink W, Hendriks VM. Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment. Addiction. 2006;101(9):1306-12.
32. Powell J, Dawkins L, West R, Powell J, Pickering A. Relapse to smoking during unaided cessation: clinical, cognitive and motivational predictors. Psychopharmacology. 2010;212(4):537-49.
33. Conklin CA, Parzynski CS, Salkeld RP, Perkins KA, Fonte CA. Cue reactivity as a predictor of successful abstinence initiation among adult smokers. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology. 2012;20(6):473.
34. Janes AC, Pizzagalli DA, Richardt S, Frederick BdB, Holmes AJ, Sousa J, et al. Neural Substrates of Attentional Bias for Smoking-Related Cues: An fMRI Study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:2339.
35. Marhe R, Luijten M, van de Wetering BJM, Smits M, Franken IHA. Individual Differences in Anterior Cingulate Activation Associated with Attentional Bias Predict Cocaine Use After Treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:1085.
36. Schoenmakers TM, de Bruin M, Lux IF, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DH, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2010;109(1):30-6.
37. Gardini S, Caffarra P, Venneri A. Decreased drug-cue-induced attentional bias in individuals with treated and untreated drug dependence. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2009;21(4):179-85.
38. Shafiee H. Development and validation of the computer-based word dot-probe task for investigation of the effect of attentional bias on social anxiety. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2014;8(2):149-54.
39. Ebrahimi Kheir Abadi A. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy in attentional bias components of patients with generalized anxiety disorder: A single subject study. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2015;9(2):121-8.
40. Wiers RW, Houben K, Fadardi JS, Van Beek P, Rhemtulla M, Cox WM. Alcohol cognitive bias modification training for problem drinkers over the web. Addictive behaviors. 2015;40:21-6.
41. Rinck M, Wiers RW, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Relapse prevention in abstinent alcoholics by cognitive bias modification: Clinical effects of combining approach bias modification and attention bias modification. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2018;86(12):1005.
42. Wiers RW, Zerhouni O, den Uyl T, Boffo M. Cognitive bias modification in the treatment of addiction.  Cognition and Addiction: Elsevier; 2020. p. 231-41.
43. Field M, Caren R, Fernie G, De Houwer J. Alcohol approach tendencies in heavy drinkers: Comparison of effects in a relevant stimulus-response compatibility task and an approach/avoidance Simon task. Psychology of addictive behaviors. 2011;25(4):697-701.
44. Machulska A, Zlomuzica A, Adolph D, Rinck M, Margraf J. “A cigarette a day keeps the goodies away”: smokers show automatic approach tendencies for smoking—but not for food-related stimuli. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):1-15.
45. Wiers CE, Kühn S, Javadi AH, Korucuoglu O, Wiers RW, Walter H, et al. Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology. 2013;229(1):187-97.
46. Wiers R, Rinck M, Dictus M, Van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action‐tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G‐allele. Genes, Brain and Behavior. 2009;8(1):101-6.
47. Brooks SJ, Wiemerslage L, Burch K, Maiorana S, Cocolas E, Schiöth HB, et al. The impact of cognitive training in substance use disorder: the effect of working memory training on impulse control in methamphetamine users. Psychopharmacology. 2017;234(12):1911-21.
48. Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Developmental cognitive neuroscience. 2013;4(14):38-51.
49. Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological science. 2011;22(4):490-7.
50. Machulska A, Zlomuzica A, Rinck M, Assion H-J, Margraf J. Approach bias modification in inpatient psychiatric smokers. Journal of psychiatric research. 2016;76:44-51.
51. Wittekind CE, Feist A, Schneider BC, Moritz S, Fritzsche A. The approach-avoidance task as an online intervention in cigarette smoking: a pilot study. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2015;46:115-20.
52. Topp L, Degenhardt L, Kaye S, Darke S. The emergence of potent forms of methamphetamine in Sydney, Australia: A case study of the IDRS as a strategic early warning system. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2002;21(4):341-8.
53. McKetin R, Kelly E, McLaren J. The relationship between crystalline methamphetamine use and methamphetamine dependence. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2006;85(3):198-204.
54. Semple SJ, Patterson TL, Rant I. Methamphetamine use and depressive symptoms among heterosexual men and women. Journal of Substance Use. 2005;10(1):31-47.
55. Sommers I, Baskin D, Baskin-Sommers A. Methamphetamine use among young adults: health and social consequences. Addictive behaviors. 2006;31(8):1469-76.
56. Wright FD, Beck AT, Newman CF, Liese BS. Cognitive therapy of substance abuse: theoretical rationale. NIDA research monograph. 1993;137:123-.
57. Rahbarian M, Doosti P. Effect of training the communication skills with cognitive-behavioral model to drug dependent couples on communication patterns and recurrent relapse. Journal of Inflammatory Disease. 2016;20(5):51-43.
58. Clerkin EM, Magee JC, Wells TT, Beard C, Barnett NP. Randomized controlled trial of attention bias modification in a racially diverse, socially anxious, alcohol dependent sample. Behaviour research and therapy. 2016;87:58-69.
59. khodadadi M NM, Amani H, . DOT PROBE TASK &COGNITIVE BIAS modification software  institute for behavioral &cognitive sxience. 2015.
60. Rinck M, Becker ES. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2007;38(2):105-20.
61. van Deursen DS, Salemink E, Smit F, Kramer J, Wiers RW. Web-based cognitive bias modification for problem drinkers: protocol of a randomised controlled trial with a 2x2x2 factorial design. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):674.
62. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F. Retraining automatic action‐tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105(2):279-87.
63. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS: Sage publications; 2009.
64. Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WA. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2007;60(12):1234-8.
65. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. Bmj. 2001;323(7321):1123-4.
66. Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2009;101(3):137-45.
67. Schoenmakers T, Wiers RW, Jones BT, Bruce G, Jansen A. Attentional re‐training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization. Addiction. 2007;102(3):399-405.
68. Heitmann J, Bennik EC, van Hemel-Ruiter ME, de Jong PJ. The effectiveness of attentional bias modification for substance use disorder symptoms in adults: a systematic review. Systematic reviews. 2018;7(1):160.
69. Attwood AS, O'sullivan H, Leonards U, Mackintosh B, Munafò MR. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction. 2008;103(11):1875-82.
70. Field M, Duka T, Tyler E, Schoenmakers T. Attentional bias modification in tobacco smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2009;11(7):812-22.
71. Metrik J, Aston ER, Kahler CW, Rohsenow DJ, McGeary JE, Knopik VS, et al. Cue-elicited increases in incentive salience for marijuana: craving, demand, and attentional bias. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2016;167:82-8.
72. Nordahl TE, Salo R, Leamon M. Neuropsychological effects of chronic methamphetamine use on neurotransmitters and cognition: a review. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. 2003;15(3):317-25.
73. Dalley JW, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron. 2011;69(4):680-94.
74. Giancola PR, Moss HB. Executive cognitive functioning in alcohol use disorders.  Recent developments in alcoholism. 14: Springer; 1998. p. 227-51.
75. Fadardi JS, Barerfan Z. The effect of drugs-atenttion control training program on drug-related attentional bias and improving other indices of recovery. Studies in education & psychology 2011;11(2):29-56.
76.                                Nowrouzi A, Taghavi MR. Smokers’ Attentional Bias Modification: Effect of Operant Conditioning. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2014;24(6):624-7.
International Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Volume 14, Issue 4
February 2021
Pages 217-224

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics