Parental Mediation of Adolescents' Internet Use

Document Type : Original Article


Department of Home Science and Centre for Research, St. Teresa's College (Autonomous) Kochi, India



Introduction: Parental mediation of adolescents’ internet use is a descriptive study to understand the level of parental control over internet usage of adolescents in the state of Kerala in India. It also aims to understand the relationship of various adolescent and parental demographic factors with parental mediation.
Method: A descriptive correlation study was conducted among the parents of 388 students between the age of 13years and 18 years old, selected from different (government, aided and private) schools through stratified sampling method. Data were collected through a survey conducted using Parental Mediation Questionnaire prepared by the investigator.
Result: The descriptive analysis revealed that active mediation was the predominant mediation strategy used by parents than co-viewing mediation and restrictive mediation. Analysis of the adolescent demographic factors revealed that a difference exists in parental mediation over internet usage of boys and girls. A difference was also found in the mediation of parents of adolescents studying in government, aided and private schools. The study also revealed that younger parents in Kerala mediated the internet usage of adolescents' more than older parents. Other demographic factors related to parents including their education, employment status or annual family income had no significant relation to their parental mediation.
Conclusion: The study pinpoints the need to sensitize the parent community and provide them with ample support for parental mediation over internet usage of adolescents.


  1. Internet users in India to reach Choi 627 million in 2019. (2019, March 6) The Economic Times. Retrieved from
  2. Yadav, Priyanka & Banwari, Girish & Parmar, Chirag & Maniar, Rajesh. Internet addiction and its correlates among high school students: A preliminary study from Ahmedabad, India. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2013, 6: 500-5. 10.1016/j.ajp.2013.06.004.
  3. Pashaei F, Nikbakht A. R. N, Tavakkol Kh. Young people experience of living with internet: A qualitative study. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2009, 2 (4) : 333-337.
  4. Regina, al. Compulsive internet use among adolescents: bidirectional parent– child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2010, 38(1): 77–89.
  5. Warren, R. In words and deeds: Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. Journal of Family Communication 2001, 1: 211-231.
  6. Nathanson, A. I. Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children's aggression. Communication Research, 1999, 26(2), 124—143.
  7. Nathanson, A. I. Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2001, 45: 201—220.
  8. Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1999, 43(1):52–66. doi:10.1080/08838159909364474.
  9. Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. H. Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology, 2008, 27(4), 217–233. doi:10.1007/s12144008-9038
  10. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2008, 52(4), 581–599. doi:10.1080/08838150802437396
  11. Nathalie.S, Nikken.P & Haan. J. D. Determinants of Internet Mediation. Journal of Children and Media, 2013 7(1), 96 – 113, Doi: 10.1080/17482798.2012.739806
  12. Lee, S.-J., & Chae, Y.-G. Children’s Internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007, 10(5), 640–644.
  13. Mesch, G. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009, 12(4), 387–393. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0068.
  14. Fujioka, Y., & Weintraub Austin, E. The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2003, 47(3): 418–434.
  15. Mendoza, Kelly. Surveying Parental Mediation: Connections, Challenges and Questions for Media Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy and Education. 2008 1(1).
  16. Lee, S.-J. Parental restrictive mediation of children’s Internet use: Effective for what and for whom? New Media & Society, 2012, 15(4), 466–481. doi:10.1177/1461444812452412
  17. Nathanson, A. I. Parental mediation strategies. The international encyclopedia of communication, Wiley-Blackwell. 2009,  8, : 3506–3508.
  18. Shin, W., Huh, J., & Faber, R. tweens’ online privacy risks and the role of parental mediation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 2012, 56(4): 37–41.  doi:10.1080/08838151.20 12.732135
  19. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology, 2007, 31(2): 181–202. doi:10.1080/17439880600756803.
  20. Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Miyazaki, A. D. Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 2008, 84(2), 205–217.
  21. Chen. L and Shi. J. Reducing Harm from Media: A Meta – Analysis of Parental Mediation 2018, 96 (1): 173 – 193.
  22. Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use in primary school children. Computers &Education. 2010
  23. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s Internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 2013, 39(2): 250–266. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.782038.
  24. Shin. W., & Li. B. Parental Mediation of Children’s digital Technology use in Singapore, Journal of Children and Media 2017, 11 (1): 1-19, doi:17482798.2016.1203807
  25. Warren. R. Multiplatform Medition: U.S mothers’ and Fathers’ MEDIATION OF teen’s media use, Journal of Children and Media 2017,11 (4): 485 – 500. Doi:10.1080/17482798.2017.1349685.
  26. Warren, R., P. Gerke, and M.A. Kelly. Is there enough time on the clock? Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 2002, 46: 87-111.
  27. Jimoyiannis, A., & Gravani, M. Digital literacy in a lifelong learning programme for adults:Educators’ experiences and perceptions on teaching. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 2010 1(1): 40–60. doi:10.4018/jdldc.2010101903.
  28. Ahmadi, Kh. Ph.D*, Abdolmaleki, H. MSc, Afsar-Deir, B. MSc; Seyed Esmaieli, F. BSc. Influence of Family on the use of Internet. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2011 4 (4): 327-333.
  29. Kirwil, L., Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C., & Martínez Fernández, G. Parental mediation. In S. Livingstone & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children 2009: 199-215 Bristol: Policy Press.
  30. Raphael. J and Paul V.K. School-Wise Differences in Parental Educational Involvement. Indian Journal of health and wellbeing. 2018, 9 (12): 956 – 963