Family Functioning and Adolescents’ Academic Engagement in Secondary Schools in Ogun State, Nigeria

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Psychology, Guidance and Counselling, School of Education, Federal College of Education, Abeokuta, Nigeria

2 Department of Educational Foundations and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago- Iwoye, Nigeria

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated the influence of family functioning on academic engagement of secondary school adolescents in Ogun State, Nigeria.
Method: The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional survey research design.  A sample of 1,800 senior secondary school students was selected through the multi-stage stratified random sampling technique from an estimated population of 103,981 senior secondary school I and II students in the 2015/2016 academic year. The study adopted two instruments for data collection. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson Product Moment Correlation, Independent t-test and Multiple Regression analysis.
Results: Findings revealed a significant influence of family functioning on students’ academic engagement. Among the factors of family functioning, problem solving was found to be the most potent contributor to academic engagement, followed by general function. Affective involvement was next and this was followed, though negatively, by affective response. Behavior control was the next potent predictor although negatively too. It was also discovered that communication and roles were not good predictors of students’ academic engagement.
Conclusion: Students’ academic engagement specifically depends on the overall family functioning, and more distinctively on problem solving, affective response, affective involvement and behavior control dimensions of family functioning which will positively influence adolescent students’ academic engagement.

Keywords


References

  1. McCormick AC, Kinzie J, Gonyea RM. Student engagement:
    Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 47-92). London: Springer. 2013.
  2. Vekkaila J. Doctoral Student Engagement: The Dynamic Interplay between Students and Scholarly Communities. Doctoral thesis, No. 350, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 2014.
  3. Harrison T. Conceptualising student engagement: A co-creation perspective. Paper presented at the Working Together to Take. Quality Forward: A Selection of Papers from the 8th European Quality Assurance Forum, the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. 2013.
  4. Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 2013; 38(5): 758-773.
  5. Schaufeli WB, Martinez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2012; 33(5): 464-481.
  6. Caro DH, McDonald JT, Willms JD. Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Canadian Journal of Education, 2009; 32: 558-590.
  7. Huisman J, Rani U, Smits J. School characteristics, socio-economic status and culture as determinant of primary school environment in India. NICE Working Paper 10-109. Institute for Management Research, Radbond University, Nijmegen 2010.
  8. Sirin SR, Sirin LR. Components of school engagement among African adolescents. Journal of Developmental Science, 2005; 9(1): 5-13.
  9. Sbnooco R. Students academic engagement and the academic gap between black and white middle school students. (doctoral dissertation, university of Minnesota). 2009. Retrieved from http://proquest,umi.com.on 17th July, 2018.
  10. Wang MT, Holcombe R. Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 2010; 47(3): 633-662.
  11. Fergie G, Beeke S, McKenna C, Creme P. "It's a Lonely Walk": Supporting postgraduate researchers through Writing. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2011; 23(2): 236-245
  12. Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001; 86: 499 –512. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
  13. Bakker A B, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2007; 22: 309 –328. http://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  14. Rudman A. Gustavsson P. Burnout during nursing education predicts lower occupational preparedness and future clinical performance: A longitudinal study. April  International journal of nursing studies 2012; 49(8): 988-1001   http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.03.010
  15. Dahlin M, Jenny F, Runeson B. Factors at medical school and work related to exhaustion among physicians in their first postgraduate year. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 2010; 64(6): 402-8  http://doi.org/10.3109/08039481003759219
  16. Hill NE. “Partnerships” for parental involvement during middle school: Challenging assumptions.  Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2010; 45(1): 740-753
  17. Vahedi M. A study of parents’ participations in high schools administration and its effects on school activities. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010; 2: 359-363.
  18. Bempechat J, Shernoff D. Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.315-342). New York: Springer. 2012.
  19. Keefe K, Berndt T. Relations of friendship quality to self-esteem in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 1996; 16(1): 110-130.
  20. Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Parker JG, Bowker JC. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp.141-80). Hoboken: Wiley. 2008.
  21. Gest SD, Rulison KL, Davidson AJ, Welsh JA, Domitrovich CE. A reputation for success (or failure): The association of peer academic reputations with academic self-concept, effort, and performance across the upper elementary grades. Developmental Psychology, 2008; 44(3): 625-636.
  22. Boxer P, Goldstein S, DeLorenzo T, Savoy S, Mercado I. Educational aspiration-expectation discrepancies: Relation to socioeconomic and academic risk-related factors. Journal of Adolescence, 2011; 34(4): 609-617.
  23. Chau K, Baumann M, Kabuth B, Chau N. School difficulties in immigrant adolescent students and roles of socioeconomic factors, unhealthy behaviors, and physical and mental health.BMC Public Health, 2012; 12: 453-464.
  24. Davis-Kean PE. The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 2005; 19(2): 294-304.
  25. Gohain H. A study of socio-economic status and academic achievement. Golden Research Thoughts, 2012; 2(3): 1-13.
  26. Parker P, Schoon I, Tsai YM, Nagy G, Trautwein U, Eccles J. Achievement, agency, gender, and socioeconomic background as predictors of post school choices: A multi-context study. Developmental Psychology, 2012; 48(6): 1629-1642.
  27. Chen J. Grade-level differences: Relations of parental, teacher and peer support to academic engagement and achievement among Hong Kong students. School Psychology International, 2008; 29(2): 183-198.
  28. Furrer C, Skinner E. Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003; 95(1):148-162.
  29. Hughes J. Kwok O. Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers' engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007; 99(1): 39-51.
  30. Veiga FH. Students' family and violence in schools. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2009; 2: 567-574.
  31. Wentzel K. Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1998; 90(2): 202-209.
  32. Simons-Morton B, Chen R. Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 2009; 41(1): 3-25.
  33. Simons-Morton B, Haynie D. Application of authoritative parenting to adolescent health behavior. In R. DiClemente, R. Crosby., & M. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories and models in health promotion research and practice (pp.100-125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2002.
  34. Steinberg L, Morris AS. Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001; 52: 83-110.
  35. Winek JL. Systemic family therapy: From theory of practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. 2010.
  36. Openshaw KP. The relationship between family functioning, family resilience, and quality of life among vocational rehabilitation clients. (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University). 2011
  37. Lian T, Yusooff F. The effects of family functioning on self-esteem of children. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2009; 9(4): 643-650.
  38. Banki A, Akhavan S, Hakami M, Borjali M, Karimi-Zarchi AA. Comparing family performance components between patients suffering from tension headaches and the normal groups. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences 2014, 8(3): 247-252
  39. Shaker-Dolagh A. Afrooz GA. Narimani M., Emamipoor S. The effectiveness of short-term object relations couples therapy on improvement of family functioning of clients filing for divorce. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences 2014; 8(2): 123-129
  40. Hailikari TK, Parpala A. What impedes or enhances my studying? The interrelation between approaches to learning, factors influencing study progress and earned credits. Teaching in Higher Education (ahead-of-print), 2014:  1-13.
  41. Walsh F. Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice, Family Process, 2013; 42: 1-18.
  42. Sixbey MT. Development of the family resilience assessment scale to identify family resilience constructs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).   2010
  43. King G, McDougall J, DeWit D, Hong S, Miller L, Offord D, et al. Pathways to children’s academic performance and prosocial behaviour: Roles of physical health status, environmental, family, and child factors. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2005;52(4): 313-344.
  44. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-romá V, Bakker AB. The Measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2002; 3(1): 71-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  45. Neabel B.  Fothergill-Bourbonnais F. & Dunning J. Family assessment tools: A review of the literature from 1978-1997. Heart and Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care 2000; 29(3); 196-209. http://doi.org/10.1067/mhl.2000.106938
  46. Navarro-Abal Y, Gómez-Salgado J, López-López  MJ, Climent-Rodríguez  JA. Organisational Justice, Burnout, and Engagement in University Students: A Comparison between Stressful Aspects of Labour and University Organisation.  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018; 15: 2116; doi:10.3390/ijerph15102116
  47. Naghavi F. Family functioning and early adolescents’ psychopathology.  World Applied Sciences Journal 2011; 15 (11): 1512-1517
  48. Baron P, Corbin L. Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 2012; 31(6): 759-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
  49. Alrashidi O, Phan HP, Ngu BH. Academic engagement: An overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualisations. International Education Studies.2016; 9(2): 41 -52
  50. Phan HP, Ngu BH. Longitudinal examination of personal self-efficacy and engagement-related attributes: How do they relate. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014; 3(4): 80-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.11
  51. Sharma BR, Bhaumik PK. Student engagement and its predictors: An exploratory study in an Indian business school. Global Business Review, 2013; 14(1): 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0972150912466364
  52. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 2004; 74(1): 59-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  53. Tudor KE, Spray CM. Approaches to measuring academic resilience: A systematic review. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 2017; 7 (4): 41-61.
  54. Stubbs NS. Maynard DB. Academic self-efficacy, school engagement and family functioning, among postsecondary students in the Caribbean. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2017; 26(3): 792-799.
  55. Marsh HW. Martin  AJ. Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011; 81(1): 59-77. http://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501.
  56. Mandara J, Murray CB, Telesford JM, Varner FA, Richman SB. Observed Gender Differences in African American Mother-Child Relationships and Child Behavior. Family Relations, 2012; 61(1): 129–141. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00688.x
  57. Ach E,  Gerhardt CA, Barrera M,  Kupst MJ, Meyer EA, Patenaude AF, et al.  Family factors associated with academic achievement deficits in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Psychooncology; 2013; 22: 1731–1737. http://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3202
  58. Max JE, Roberts MA, Koele SL, Lindgren SD, Robin DA, Arndt S, et al. Cognitive outcome in children and adolescents following severe traumatic brain injury: Influence of psychosocial, psychiatric, and injury-related variables. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1999; 5(1): 58-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617799511089
  59. Ryan CE, Epstein NB, Keitner GI, Miller IW, Bishop DS. Evaluating and treating families: The McMaster Approach. New York: Routledge, 2005, 
  60. Epstein NB. Family therapy today: An overview. Paper presented at the International Symposium, Psychiatry over the last decades, Montebello, Quebec.) 1969.