Comparing Attitudes toward Marriage and Spouse Selection Criteria among People on the Verge of First Marriage and Remarriage

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Counseling‚ Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Counseling‚ Faculty of Education and Psychology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

3 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the complexities and challenges of remarriage, the present study was conducted to compare attitudes toward marriage and spouse selection criteria among people on the verge of first marriage and remarriage.
Method: The present study was a causal-comparative survey. The statistical population of this study included all people on the verge of first marriage and remarriage referring to marriage registration offices and counseling centers in Shiraz, of which 112 people were elected during 2020 using the convenient sampling method. Participants completed the Braaten and Rosén's Martial Attitude Scale and Refahi et al.'s Selection Criteria Inventory. The data were analyzed using an independent t-test, for which SPSS22 was used.
Results: Findings revealed that there is no significant difference between people on the verge of marriage and remarriage in terms of attitudes toward marriage. In addition, among the spouse selection criteria, single people on the verge of marriage had a higher average than remarriage (p<0.05).
Conclusion: According to the difference of people on the verge of first marriage and remarriage in terms of spouse selection criteria, in premarital counseling, it is better to consider the needs, conditions and criteria of each group separately.

Keywords

References

  1. Rehim M KS, Alshamsi W & Kaba A. Perceptions of divorcees towards factors leading to divorce in UAE. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2020;61(8):582-92. doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2020.1824205
  2. Strizzi JM, Ciprić A, Sander S, Hald GM. Divorce is stressful, but how stressful? Perceived stress among recently divorced Danes. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2021;62(4):295-311. doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1871838
  3. Jaberi S, Etemadi O, Fatehizade M, Rabbani Khorasgani A. Discovering of the divorce process in Iranian men initiator: A qualitative study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2021;62(2):83-103. doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2020.1833294
  4. Asanjarani F, Jazayeri R, Fatehizade M, Etemadi O, De Mol J. Effectiveness of Fisher’s rebuilding after divorce seminar on post-divorce adjustment and satisfaction with life in divorced women. Quarterly Journal of Social Work. 2017;6(2):05-13. http://socialworkmag.ir/article-1-314-en.html
  5. Mohammadi R, Mohammadi Z. Challenges for Remarriage of Women with Children: A Qualitative Study. Women in Development & Politics. 2019;17(1):97-119. 10.22059/jwdp.2019.275723.1007586
  6. Riggio HR, Weiser DA. Attitudes toward marriage: Embeddedness and outcomes in personal relationships. Personal relationships. 2008;15(1):123-40. doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00188.x
  7. Yekleh M, Mohsenzade F, Zahrakar K. Study of Quality of Remarriage After Divorce Grounded Theory Method. Quarterly Journal of Social Work. 2018;7(3):17-31. http://socialworkmag.ir/article-1-442-en.html
  8. Casad BJ, Salazar MM, Macina V. The real versus the ideal: Predicting relationship satisfaction and well-being from endorsement of marriage myths and benevolent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2015;39(1):119-29. doi.org/10.1177/0361684314528304
  9. Mansouri H. Investigation of the factors and sub-factors affecting the choice of spouse using techniques of Multidisciplinary Decision Making (MADM) (Case study: male and female students of Bandar Abbas). Med J Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2019;16:90-108. http://rdch.ir/article-1-268-en.html
  10. Kanani MA, Hamidifar M, Mohammaqdzadeh H. Mate selection and its criteria: A study among married men and women in Rasht City. Sociology of Social Institutions. 2016;3(8):256-29. doi.10.22080/ssi.2017.1427
  11. Hossein Khanzadeh A, Niyazi I, Taher M, Moghtadaei K, Mehry S, Mohammadi H. Analyzing and prioritizing of criteria of spouse selection in single students of Guilan university. Journal of psychologicalscience. 2015;14(53):75-90. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-248-en.html
  12. Beheshtian M. A comparison between the (social, cultural, economic, physical and demographic) marriage criteria of couples who are on the verge of their second marriage and the marriage criteria of their first marriage. Sociological Cultural Studies. 2016;7(2):1-17. https://socialstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/mobile/article_2237.html?lang=en
  13. Yousefi N, Bagheryan M. The investigation of the criteria of spouse selecting and marital burnout as forwarded variants in couples applicant for divorce and couples desirous of continuing the marital status. Family counseling and psychotherapy. 2012;1(3):284-301. doi.20.1001.1.22516654.1390.1.3.2.4
  14. Peters JF. A comparison of mate selection and marriage in the first and second marriages in a selected sample of the remarried divorced. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 1976;7(3):483-90. doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.7.3.483
  15. Zahl-Olsen R, Thuen F, Espehaug B. Divorce and remarriage in Norway: a prospective cohort study between 1981 and 2013. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2019;60(8):600-11. doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2019.1619378
  16. Salkind NJ. Encyclopedia of research design: sage; 2010.
  17. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education [5 th edn] London: Routledge Falmer. Teaching in higher education. 2000;41(4):19-30. doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
  18. Braaten EB, Rosén LA. Development and validation of the Marital Attitude Scale. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 1998;29(3-4):83-91. doi.org/10.1300/J087v29n03_05
  19. Nilforoshan P, Navidian A, Abedi A. Studying the psychometric properties of marital attitude scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2013;1(1):35-47. http://ijpn.ir/article-1-59-en.html
  20. Refahi J, Sanaei Zakir B, Shafiabadi A, Pasha Sharifi H. A comparative study of marriage criteria in Shirazi men and women in two situations during marriage and now. Consulting News and Research. 2010;9(33):7-31. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=137901
  21. Isanejad O, Hooshmand S. Factor structure, validity and reliability of Mate Selection Criteria Inventory (MSCI) in an Iranian sample. Journal of Family Research. 2019;14(3):327-44. https://jfr.sbu.ac.ir/article_97664.html
  22. Williams L. Attitudes toward marriage in northern Vietnam: what qualitative data reveal about variations across gender, generation, and geography. Journal of Population Research. 2009;26(4):285-304. https://www.proquest.com/docview/210128912
  23. Hansson L, Laidmäe V-I. Surviving Divorce: Reconstruction of Divorce Experiences on the Pages of an Estonian Women’s Magazine. The Family Journal. 2014;22(1):88-97. doi.org/10.1177/1066480713505061
  24. Khan TA, Hamid W. Lived experiences of divorced women in Kashmir: a phenomenological study. Journal of Gender Studies. 2021;30(4):379-94. doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1826295
  25. Johnson SM. Introduction to attachment. Attachment processes in couple and family therapy. 2003:3-17.

26.      Gholamaliee B, Jamoorpour S, Sori A, Soheilizad M, Khazaei S, Noryian F, et al. Criteria of marriage in married couples referred to Tuyserkan marriage counseling Center in 2015. Pajouhan Scientific Journal. 2016;14(4):38-47. doi. 10.21859/psj-140438

International Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Volume 16, Issue 1
April 2022
Pages 17-22

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics